Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

ACC : Acute and Critical Care

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Author index

Page Path
HOME > Issue > Author index
Search
Hae Jung Na 1 Article
Infection
Clinical Application of the Quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment Score at Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients with Bacteremia: A Single-Center Experience of Korea
Hae Jung Na, Eun Suk Jeong, Insu Kim, Won-Young Kim, Kwangha Lee
Korean J Crit Care Med. 2017;32(3):247-255.   Published online August 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.4266/kjccm.2017.00241
  • 6,739 View
  • 180 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Crossref
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background
We evaluated the clinical usefulness of the quick Sepsis-Related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score (based on the 2016 definition of sepsis) at intensive care unit admission in Korean patients with bacteremia. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from 236 patients between March 2011 and February 2016. In addition to the qSOFA, the Modified Early Warning score (MEWS) and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria were calculated. Results: The patients’ median age was 69 years, and 61.0% were male. Of the patients, 127 (53.8%) had a qSOFA score ≥2 points. They had significantly higher rates of septic shock, thrombocytopenia, and hyperlactatemia, and increased requirements for ventilator care, neuromuscular blocking agents, vasopressors, and hemodialysis within 72 hours after intensive care unit admission. They also had a significantly higher 28-day mortality rate. When analyzed using common thresholds (MEWS ≥5 and ≥2 SIRS criteria), patients with a MEWS ≥5 had the same results as those with a qSOFA score ≥2 (P < 0.05). However, patients with ≥2 SIRS criteria showed no significant differences. Conclusions: Our results show that a qSOFA score ≥2 at admission is a useful screening tool for predicting disease severity and medical resource usage within 72 hours after admission, and for predicting 28-day mortality rates in patients with bacteremia. In addition, qSOFA scores may be more useful than SIRS criteria in terms of prognostic utility.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A catalogue of tools and variables from crisis and routine care to support decision-making about allocation of intensive care beds and ventilator treatment during pandemics: Scoping review
    Magnolia Cardona, Claudia C. Dobler, Eyza Koreshe, Daren K. Heyland, Rebecca H. Nguyen, Joan P.Y. Sim, Justin Clark, Alex Psirides
    Journal of Critical Care.2021; 66: 33.     CrossRef
  • Consensus recommendation: Indications and methods for microbiological wound diagnostics
    Axel Kramer, Ojan Assadian, Jürgen Bohnert, Georg Daeschlein, Joachim Dissemond, Veronika Gerber, Peter Hinz, Adam Junka, Simon Kim, Roald Papke, Christian Willy
    Wound Medicine.2018; 23: 53.     CrossRef

ACC : Acute and Critical Care